[1]周栋,张成军,严武建,等.2022年青海门源6.9级地震发震构造及甘肃灾区震害特征研究[J].世界地震工程,2023,39(01):020-27.[doi:10.19994/j.cnki.WEE.2023.0003]
　ZHOU Dong,ZHANG Chengjun,YAN Wujian,et al.Study on the seismogenic mechanism of the 2022 Menyuan MS6.9 and the seismic damage characteristics in Gansu Province[J].,2023,39(01):020-27.[doi:10.19994/j.cnki.WEE.2023.0003]
点击复制

2022年青海门源6.9级地震发震构造及甘肃灾区震害特征研究
分享到：

《世界地震工程》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
39
期数:
2023年01期
页码:
020-27
栏目:
专栏：2022年破坏性地震
出版日期:
2023-02-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on the seismogenic mechanism of the 2022 Menyuan MS6.9 and the seismic damage characteristics in Gansu Province
文章编号:
1007-6069(2023)01-0020-08
作者:
周栋1; 张成军1; 严武建2; 康林2
1.甘肃省地震局张掖地震监测中心站,张掖7340002.中国地震局黄土地震工程重点实验室,甘肃兰州730000
Author(s):
ZHOU Dong1;  ZHANG Chengjun1;  YAN Wujian2;  KANG Lin2
1. Zhangye Earthquake Monitoring Center Station, Gansu Earthquake Administration, Lanzhou 734000, China )/(2. Key Laboratory of Loess Earthquake Engineering, China Earthquake Administration,Lanzhou 730000, China
关键词:
门源6.9级地震 震源机制 发震构造 房屋破坏 生命线工程破坏 地表破裂带
Keywords:
Menyuan MS6.9 earthquake focal mechanism seismogenic structure structure damage lifeline project damage surface rupture zone
分类号:
P315.941
DOI:
10.19994/j.cnki.WEE.2023.0003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
通过对2022年1月8日青海门源6.9级地震的震源机制、发震构造、房屋和重大生命线工程震害、地震地表破裂带等震害调查资料的综合分析,系统介绍了此次地震震源机制、发震构造、地震烈度分布特点、房屋破坏特征及机理、生命线工程破坏特征及地表破裂带特征。研究结果表明:门源6.9级地震震中位置位于冷龙岭断裂带的西段,性质以左旋走滑为主,其与震源机制解得到的结果相一致,均为走滑型破裂类型 地震最大烈度Ⅸ度,烈度Ⅵ度(含)以上面积约23 417 km2,等震线长轴呈NWW走向,长轴200 km,短轴153 km 整体上房屋破坏较轻,甘肃境内主要属Ⅶ和Ⅵ度区影响范围,极少部分为Ⅷ度区影响范围 此次地震中滑坡灾害和生命线工程震害较少,主要在Ⅸ和Ⅷ度区造成部分路面裂缝,最为严重的则为兰新高铁浩门至军马场区间祁连山一号隧道群线路桥梁严重受损,隧道震害主要集中在断层影响范围内,其中隧道受破坏严重段约350m,占隧道全长的5.33%,受破坏较严重段分别位于严重段大里程侧402m和小里程侧646m范围内,占隧道全长的15.96%,其余段落震害总体轻微 地震造成地表破裂带约22 km,地震造成的地表与冰面张裂隙和挤压鼓包随处可见。
Abstract:
Based on the comprehensive analysis of the investigation data of focal mechanism, seismogenic structure, seismic damage of buildings and lifeline engineering, and surface rupture zone of Menyuan Ms6.9 earthquake on January 8, 2022 in Qinghai Province, The focal mechanism, seismogenic structure, distribution characteristics of seismic intensity, failure characteristics and mechanism of houses, failure characteristics of lifeline project and surface rupture zone of the earthquake were systematically introduced. The results show that the epicenter of menyuan Ms6.9earthquake is located in the western segment of Lenglongling fault zone, which is mainly characterized by left-lateral strike-slip, which is consistent with the results of focal mechanism solution, and is a strike-slip rupture type. The area above the maximum intensity Ⅸ and intensity Ⅵ is about 23417km2. The long axis of the isoseismic line is NWW direction, the long axis was 200km and the short axis was 153km. On the whole, the damage of houses is relatively light, mainly belonging to degree Ⅶ and Ⅵ zone in Gansu province, and a small part of the area of Ⅷ zone. The disaster of earthquake landslide and lifeline engineering is less, mainly in the Ⅸ, Ⅷ degree area caused some road cracks. The most serious damage is the No. 1 tunnel bridge of Qilian Mountain between Haomen and Junmachang of Lanzhou-Xinjiang High-speed Railway, the earthquake damage are mainly concentrated within the influence range of the fault. The severely damaged section of the tunnel is about 350 m, accounting for 5.33% of the total length of tunnel the less seriously damaged section is located within 402 m at the large mileage side and 646 m at the small mileage side, accounting for 15.96% of the total length of tunnel the earthquake damage in other sections is generally slight. The earthquake caused the surface rupture zone of about 22 kilometers, and caused the surface and ice cracks and extrusion bulge can be seen everywhere.

参考文献/References:

[1] https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000g9zq/moment-tensor.
[2] 蒋溥, 戴丽思, 徐峰, 等. 华北断块区现代构造断裂的动力学问题的地震研究[J]. 地震地质, 1983, 5(1): 15 — 28.
JIANG Pu, DAI Lisi, XU Feng, et al. Seismological study of dynamic problems of recent fracture in the North China fault block region[J]. Seismology and Geology, 1983, 5(1): 15 — 28.(in Chinese)
[3] 何文贵, 刘百篪, 袁道阳, 等. 冷龙岭活动断裂的滑动速率研究[J]. 西北地震学报, 2000, 22(1): 90 — 97.
HE Wengui, LIU Baichi, YUAN Daoyang, et al. Research on slip rates of the lenglongling active fault zone[J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 2000, 22(1): 90 — 97.(in Chinese)
[4] 何文贵.冷龙岭断裂古地震初步研究,活动断裂研究8.北京:地震出版社,2001.
[5] 董洁. 中国地震局发布青海门源6.9级地震烈度图[N]. 青海日报, 2022-01-12.
DONG Jie. China Seismological Bureau Releases Intensity Map of 6.9 Magnitude Earthquake in Menyuan[N].Qinghai Daily, 2022-01-12.(in Chinese)
[6] 石玉成, 王兰民, 林学文, 等. 黄土生土建筑震害预测研究[J]. 西北地震学报, 2004, 26(3): 206 — 211.
SHI Yucheng, WANG Lanmin, LIN Xuewen, et al. Prediction on eartuquake damage of raw soil buildings in loess area[J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 2004, 26(3): 206 — 211.(in Chinese)
[7] 中铁第一勘察设计院集团有限公司8兰新客专地震灾害复旧西宁至张掖段(K1965+525-K1981+874)整治工程施工图第五篇隧道[R].西安:中铁第一勘察设计院集团有限公司,2022.
China Railway First Survey and Design Institute Group Ltd. Part V Tunnel Construction Drawing of Earthquake Eisaster Restoration and Treatment Project for Lanxin High Speed Railway in Xining-Zhangye Section(K1965+525-K1981+874)[R].Xian: China Railway First Survey and Design Institute Group Ltd, 2022.(in Chinese)
[8] 张威, 李明, 姬云平, 等. 青海门源M6.9地震典型隧道破坏特征分析与启示[J]. 地震工程学报, 2022, 44(3): 661 — 669.
ZHANG Wei, LI Ming, JI Yunping, et al. Analysis and enlightenment of typical failure characteristics of tunnels caused by the Menyuan M6.9 earthquake in Qinghai Province[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 2022, 44(3): 661 — 669.(in Chinese)

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-05-05 修回日期:2022-08-15
基金项目:甘肃省地震局地震科技发展基金(2020GZ01) 中国地震局地震工程与工程振动重点实验室重点专项(2020EEEVL0304)
作者简介:周 栋(1989 —),男,本科,助理工程师,主要从事地震波研究. E-mail:zhoudlzu@126.com
通讯作者:严武建(1980 —),男,博士,副研究员,主要从事岩土地震工程研究. E-mail:yanwj1980@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01