[1]李昆,周煜,陶思宇,等.云南漾濞6.4级地震公共建筑的震害特征[J].世界地震工程,2021,(03):001-8.
　LI Kun,ZHOU Yu,TAO Siyu,et al.Seismic damage to public buildings in the M6.4 Yangbi earthquake in Yunnan[J].,2021,(03):001-8.
点击复制

云南漾濞6.4级地震公共建筑的震害特征
分享到：

《世界地震工程》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
期数:
2021年03期
页码:
001-8
栏目:
出版日期:
2021-07-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Seismic damage to public buildings in the M6.4 Yangbi earthquake in Yunnan
作者:
李昆1;  周煜1;  陶思宇2;  吕珏1;  曲哲2
1. 云南省设计院集团有限公司, 云南 昆明 650228;
2. 中国地震局工程力学研究所 中国地震局地震工程与工程振动重点试验室, 河北 廊坊 065201
Author(s):
LI Kun1;  ZHOU Yu1;  TAO Siyu2;  LU Jue1;  QU Zhe2
1. Yunnan Design Institute Group Co., Ltd., Yunnan 650228, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Mechanical Engineering, China Earthquake Administration, Langfang 065201, China
关键词:
公共建筑; 非结构构件; 砌体填充墙; 集成吊顶; 钢筋混凝土框架结构
Keywords:
public buildings; nonstructural components; masonry infill wall; system suspended ceiling; reinforced concrete frame
分类号:
TU375
摘要:
2021年5月21日云南漾濞发生6.4级地震，成为继2014年6.5级鲁甸地震和6.6级景谷地震之后云南省内时隔7年的又一次震级大于6级的破坏性地震。漾濞地震虽然与鲁甸地震在震级、震源深度和震源机制等方面均较相似，但漾濞地震震中附近的地面运动强度远不及鲁甸地震，且漾濞县的抗震设防烈度远高于鲁甸；相应地，漾濞地震对抗震设防建筑造成的破坏也远轻于后者。本文首先通过比较这三次地震震中附近的强震记录的反应谱，并结合公共建筑的震后应急评估结果，说明漾濞地震和鲁甸地震中公共建筑破坏程度的显著差异。进而以位于漾濞县城的两栋钢筋混凝土公共建筑为例，介绍此次地震中砌体填充墙和吊顶等典型非结构构件的震害。
Abstract:
The M6.4 Yangbi earthquake on May 21, 2021 was another devastating earthquake (M>6) in Yunan province after seven years since the 2014 M6.5 Ludian earthquake and M6.6 Jinggu earthquake. Despite their similar magnitudes, focal depths and source mechanisms, the Yangbi and Ludian earthquakes produced ground motions near the epicenters of very different intensities and frequency contents. In addition, the seismic design intensity for buildings in Yangbi is much higher than that in Ludian. Accordingly, the seismic damages to the buildings near their epicenters were significantly different. This is made clear by comparing the response spectra of the ground motion records near the epicenters of these earthquakes and summarizing the results of the emergency inspection of public buildings immediately after the Yangbi earthquake. In addition to the insignificant structural damage, the nonstructural damage to the public buildings in the Yangbi earthquake is highlighted in the rest of the paper. The observed damage to typical nonstructural components such as masonry infills and suspended ceilings in two public buildings of reinforced concrete frame structures is introduced.

参考文献/References:

[1] 中国地震局工程力学研究所强震动观测组. 云南漾濞6.4级地震(第1报). 强震动观测简报, 6(2021), 2021.
[2] 云南新闻广播. 云南漾濞"521"地震初步统计死亡3人、受伤28人抗震救灾工作有序开展. URL:https://new.qq.com/rain/a/20210522A03MCG00
[3] 云南省地震局. 云南漾濞6.4级地震烈度图. 2021年5月25日.
[4] 刘雪艳. 基于精细化仿真的区域建筑群地震灾害风险评估方法研究. 哈尔滨:中国地震局工程力学研究所. 2021.
[5] 中华人民共和国国家标准. 建筑抗震设计规范GB50011-2010. 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 中国人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 2010.
[6] 安晓文, 李丹. 鲁甸6.5级地震建筑典型震害现象分析. 建筑结构, 2020, 50(7):28-36.
[7] 曲哲, 师骁. 汶川地震和鲁甸地震的脉冲型地震动比较研究. 工程力学, 33(8), 2016:150-157.
[8] 住建系统漾濞"5.21"地震灾区应急评估专家组. 云南漾濞"5.21"地震灾区公共建筑应急评估报告. 2021年5月28日.
[9] 震后房屋建筑应急评估技术指南. 建质抗函[2016] 84号.
[10] 云南省震后房屋建筑应急评估工作手册. 云建震[2016] 168号.
[11] LIN XC, ZHANG HY, CHEN HF, CHEN H, LIN JQ. Field investigation on severely damaged aseismic buildings in 2014Ludian earthquake. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 14(1), 169-176.
[12] FEMA E-74. Reducing the Risks of Nonstructural Earthquake Damage:A Practical Guide[S]. Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2011.
[13] 中华人民共和国国家标准. 建筑抗震韧性评价标准GB/T 38591-2020. 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 2020.
[14] 叶良浩, 曲哲, 孙海林, 宫婷. 采用不同减震结构体系的医疗建筑地震经济损失评估[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2020, 41(7):15-26. YE Lianghao, QU Zhe, SUN Hailin, GONG Ting. Earthquake loss evaluation of a medical facility seismically retrofitted by different seismic damage control methods[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2020, 41(7):15-26.(in Chinese)
[15] 谢贤鑫, 张令心, 曲哲. 足尺砌体填充墙在面内往复荷载作用下的易损性研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2020, 41(6):161-169. XIE Xianxin, ZHANG Lingxin, QU Zhe. Seismic fragility of full-scale masonry infill subjected to in-plane cyclic loading[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2020, 41(6):161-169.(in Chinese)

相似文献/References:

[1]秦丽,郭声波,李业学.单点支撑非结构构件抗震减震研究综述[J].世界地震工程,2011,(03):163.
　QIN Li,GUO Shengbo,LI Yexue.Review for seismic research on one-point-supported nonstructural elements[J].,2011,(03):163.
[2]张令心,张明远,陈永盛,等.基于性态的非结构构件抗震设计初探[J].世界地震工程,2016,(04):293.
　ZHANG Lingxin,ZHANG Mingyuan,CHEN Yongsheng,et al.Preliminary study on performance-based seismic design of nonstructural components[J].,2016,(03):293.
[3]张辰啸,戴君武,杨永强.多层古建抬梁式木结构振动台试验研究[J].世界地震工程,2017,33(03):061.
　ZHANG Chenxiao,DAI Junwu,YANG Yongqiang.Study on the shaking table test of ancient multi-storey post-and-lintel timber structure[J].,2017,33(03):061.
[4]曹宇腾,曲哲,纪晓东.考虑结构地震反应特性的非结构构件动力加载制度[J].世界地震工程,2018,34(04):143.
　CAO Yuteng,QU Zhe,JI Xiaodong.Dynamic loading protocol for experiments of non-structural components considering the seismic response characteristics of building structures[J].,2018,34(03):143.
[5]尚庆学,李吉超,王涛.管线系统抗震性能研究方法综述[J].世界地震工程,2018,34(04):174.
　SHANG Qingxue,LI Jichao,WANG Tao.State of the art of study on seismic performance of piping system[J].,2018,34(03):174.
[6]陈相兆,张桂欣,孙柏涛,等.日本福岛7.3级地震灾害损失总结与讨论[J].世界地震工程,2021,(02):058.
　CHEN Xiangzhao,ZHANG Guixin,SUN Baitao,et al.Overview and comments of disaster loss in the M7.3 Fukushima earthquake[J].,2021,(03):058.
[7]李文俊,曲哲,孙海林,等.损失分布和非结构损失对房屋建筑地易损性的影响[J].世界地震工程,2021,(04):109.
　LI Wenjun,QU Zhe,SUN Hailin,et al.Influence of loss distribution and non-structural loss on the seismic vulnerability of buildings[J].,2021,(03):109.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-06-08;改回日期:2021-06-18。
基金项目:中国地震局工程力学研究所基本科研业务费专项资助重点项目（2019A01）
作者简介:李昆(1967-),男,工学硕士,正高级工程师,主要从事建筑结构抗震方面的研究.E-mail:821670606@qq.com
通讯作者:曲哲(1983-),男,工学博士,研究员,主要从事建筑结构减隔震方面的研究.E-mail:quz@iem.ac.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01