[1]黄勇,宋光有,李国昌,等.玛多地震中大野马岭大桥震害机理分析[J].世界地震工程,2021,(04):012-20.
 HUANG Yong,SONG Guangyou,LI Guochang,et al.Analysis of damage mechanism of Dayemaling bridge during the Maduo earthquake[J].,2021,(04):012-20.
点击复制

玛多地震中大野马岭大桥震害机理分析
分享到:

《世界地震工程》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
期数:
2021年04期
页码:
012-20
栏目:
出版日期:
2021-11-06

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of damage mechanism of Dayemaling bridge during the Maduo earthquake
作者:
黄勇1 宋光有1 李国昌1 俎林1 蔡丽雯2
1. 中国地震局工程力学研究所, 中国地震局地震工程与工程振动重点实验室, 哈尔滨 150080;
2. 青海省地震局, 西宁 810001
Author(s):
HUANG Yong1 SONG Guangyou1 LI Guochang1 ZU Lin1 CAI Liwen2
1. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, Institute of Enginerring Mechanics;Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration of CEA, Harbin 150080, China;
2. Seismological Bureau of Qinghai Province, Xining 810001, China
关键词:
青海玛多地震大野马岭大桥震害机理地震动模拟
Keywords:
maduo earthquakeDayemaling bridgeearthquake damage mechanismearthquake motion simulation
分类号:
TU4
摘要:
2021年5月22日青海玛多发生了Ms7.4级地震,从地震中桥梁震害情况看:此次地震的特点是断层北侧震害轻,南侧震害重。位于断层南侧的野马滩大桥是简支梁桥,发生大量落梁,是此次地震中受损最为严重的大桥之一;而位于北侧的大野马岭大桥是连续梁桥,仅发生了部分挡块开裂。其中原因值得深入研究。本文通过有限元分析软件Midas/Civil建立大野马岭大桥(上行线)模型,进行地震反应分析,讨论分析了大野马岭大桥在此次地震中的震害机理。发现南北向的地震动是造成该桥横向挡块破坏的主要原因,东西向地震动因受到桥台和纵向挡块的约束并没有出现严重损伤。若将该桥由连续梁桥变成简支梁桥,地震反应会有所变化,但总体趋势特点变化并不大。另外,本文通过现有资料选定5组地震动作为输入,进行地震反应分析,比较分析不同地震动对该桥的影响,并验证地震动模拟效果。
Abstract:
On May 22, 2021, a Ms7.4 earthquake occurred in Maduo, Qinghai. From the perspective of bridge damage in the earthquake, the characteristics of this earthquake are light damage on the north side of the fault and heavy damage on the south side of the fault. The Yematan Bridge, which located on the south side of the fault, is a simply supported girder bridge with a large number of girders drops. It is one of the most severely damaged bridges in the earthquake. The Dayemaling Bridge, which located on the north side is a continuous girder bridge, and only part of the stopper cracked. The reason is worthy of in-depth study. This paper uses the finite element analysis software Midas/Civil to establish a model of the Dayemaling Bridge, conduct seismic response analysis, and discuss and analyze the damage mechanism of the Dayemaling Bridge in this earthquake. It is found that the north-south ground motion is the main cause of the damage to the lateral block of the bridge, and the east-west ground motion is constrained by the abutment and the longitudinal block and there is no serious damage. If the bridge is changed from a continuous girder bridge to a simply supported girder bridge, the seismic response will change, but the overall trend characteristics will not change much. In addition, this paper selects 5 sets of ground motions as input based on existing data, conducts seismic response analysis, compares and analyzes the impact of different ground motions on the bridge, and verifies the effect of ground motion simulation.

参考文献/References:

[1] 李志敏, 李文巧,李涛, 等. 2021年5月22日青海玛多Ms7.4地震发震构造和地表破裂初步调查[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(3):722-737.LI Zhimin, LI Wenqiao, LI Tao, et al. Seismogenic fault and coseismic surface deformation of the Maduo Ms 7.4 earthquake in Qinghai, China:A quick report[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2021, 43(3):722-737. (in Chinese)
[2] 管仲国, 黄勇, 张昊宇, 等. 青海玛多7.4级地震桥梁工程震害特性分析[J]. 世界地震工程, 2021, 37(3):38-45.GUAN Zhongguo, HUANG Yong, ZHANG Haoyu, et al. Damage Characteristics and Analysis of Bridge Engineering in M 7.4 Qinghai Maduo Earthquake[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 37(3):38-45. (in Chinese)
[3] 蔡丽雯, 黄勇, 张昊宇, 管仲国. 2021年青海玛多7.4级地震共玉高速震害与启示[J]. 世界地震工程, 2021, 37(3):46-56.CAI Liwen, HUANG Yong, ZHANG Haoyu, GUAN Zhongguo. Earthquake damage and enlightenment from Gongyu Expressway in 2021 Qinghai Maduo M7.4 Earthquake[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 37(3):46-56. (in Chinese)
[4] 李春果, 王宏伟, 温瑞智, 等. 2021年青海玛多MS7.4地震随机有限断层三维地震动模拟[J]. 地震地质, 2021.LI Chunguo, WANG Hongwei, WEN Ruizhi, et al. Three-component ground motion simulations based on the stochastic finite-fault method for the 2021 Maduo Ms7.4 earthquake,Qinghai province[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2021, Accepted.(in Chinese)
[5] 中华人民共和国交通运输部. 公路桥梁抗震设计规范(JTG/T 2231-01-2020)[S]. 北京:人民交通出版社, 2020.Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. Specifications for Seismic Design of Highway Bridges (JTG/T 2231-01-2020)[S]. Beijing:China Communications Publishing, 2020. (in Chinese)
[6] 庄卫林, 陈乐生等.汶川地震公路震害分析-桥梁与隧道[M]. 北京:人民交通出版社, 2013.ZHUANG Weilin, CHEN Lesheng, et al.Analysis of Highways’Damage in the Wenchuan Earthquake-Bridge[M]. Beijing:China Communications Press, 2013. (in Chinese)
[7] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 城市轨道交通结构抗震设计规范(GB 50909-2014)[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2014.Ministry of Housing and urban-rural development of the People’s Republic of China. Code for seismic design of urban rail transit structures (GB 50909-2014)[S]. Beijing:China Planning Press, 2014. (in Chinese)

相似文献/References:

[1]管仲国,黄勇,张昊宇,等.青海玛多7.4级地震桥梁工程震害特性分析[J].世界地震工程,2021,(03):038.
 GUAN Zhongguo,HUANG Yong,ZHANG Haoyu,et al.Damage characteristics and analysis of bridge engineering in M7.4 Qinghai Maduo earthquake[J].,2021,(04):038.
[2]蔡丽雯,黄勇,张昊宇,等.2021年青海玛多7.4级地震共玉高速震害与启示[J].世界地震工程,2021,(03):046.
 CAI Liwen,HUANG Yong,ZHANG Haoyu,et al.Earthquake damage and enlightenment from Gongyu Expressway in 2021 Qinghai Maduo M7.4 earthquake[J].,2021,(04):046.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-08-21;改回日期:2021-09-25。
基金项目:中国地震局工程力学研究所基本科研业务费专项资助项目(2021EEEVL3013);国家自然科学基金项目(51278471);国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC1504602)
作者简介:黄勇(1969-),男,副研究员,博士,主要从事桥梁抗震和结构健康监测研究.E-mail:huangyong@iem.ac.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01