[1]陈晓龙,蒲举,陈继锋,等.玛多7.4级地震后库赛湖-玛曲-荷叶断裂活动性分析[J].世界地震工程,2021,(04):021-27.
 CHEN Xiaolong,PU Ju,CHEN Jifeng,et al.Tectonic activity analysis of Kusai Lake-Maqu-Heye Fault after Maduo M7.4 earthquake[J].,2021,(04):021-27.
点击复制

玛多7.4级地震后库赛湖-玛曲-荷叶断裂活动性分析
分享到:

《世界地震工程》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
期数:
2021年04期
页码:
021-27
栏目:
出版日期:
2021-11-06

文章信息/Info

Title:
Tectonic activity analysis of Kusai Lake-Maqu-Heye Fault after Maduo M7.4 earthquake
作者:
陈晓龙1 蒲举1 陈继锋23 尹欣欣1 张胜霞1 王维欢1
1. 甘肃省地震局, 甘肃 兰州 730000;
2. 甘肃兰州地球物理国家野外科学观测研究站, 甘肃 兰州 730000;
3. 中国地震局兰州岩土地震研究所, 甘肃 兰州 730000
Author(s):
CHEN Xiaolong1 PU Ju1 CHEN Jifeng23 YIN xinxin1 ZHANG Shengxia1 WANG Weihuan1
1. Earthquake Administration of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China;
2. Lanzhou National Observatory of Geophysics, Lanzhou 730000, China;
3. Lanzhou Institute of Geotechnical and Earthquake, China Earthquake Administration, Lanzhou 730000, China
关键词:
玛多Ms7.4级地震库赛湖-玛曲-荷叶断裂地震复发周期
Keywords:
Maduo Ms7.4 earthquakeKusai Lake-Maqu-Heye Faultearthquake recurrence period
分类号:
P315.3
摘要:
青海玛多Ms7.4级地震发生后,与此次地震发震断裂相邻且近平行状分布的库赛湖-玛曲-荷叶断裂(以下简称"库-玛-荷断裂")截至2021年6月1日共发生5次Ms≥3.0的余震事件。本文分别计算了该断裂上震级较大的4次余震事件震源机制解,并对玛多Ms7.4级地震进行了静态库伦破裂应力改变量(ΔCFS)分析。结果显示:库-玛-荷断裂占主导地位的左旋走滑运动并没有简单延伸贯通,断裂带各段枢纽处应力分布错综复杂,断裂总体受到来自玛多震中方向的应力扰动。结合前人研究,本文认为库-玛-荷断裂上发生的一系列余震事件可视为该断裂带的应力释放过程。虽然玛曲-玛沁段最后一次大地震离逝时间已经超出或接近其复发周期,但在该断裂整体应力得到一定程度释放的前提下,大地震复发周期是否发生改变值得进一步探讨。
Abstract:
After the Maduo Ms7.4 earthquake, there are 5 Ms≥3.0 aftershocks was occurred on Kusai Lake-Maqu-Heye Fault, which is located at north-northeast of the Maduo Ms7.4 earthquake epicenter. The focal mechanism solutions result of four aftershocks show that the whole movement of the fault is characterized by left lateral strike slip, but it is discontinuous, the stress distribution in each section of the fault zone is complicated. Combined with the Coulomb fracture stress distribution of Maduo Ms7.4 earthquake, we consider these aftershocks occurred on the Kusai Lake-Maqu-Heye Fault can be regarded as a stress release process. Although there are some studies suggest that the recurrence period of great earthquake is approached judged by historical experience, we still believe the recurrence period of this fault may have changed after the Maduo Ms7.4 earthquake.

参考文献/References:

[1] 詹艳, 梁明剑, 孙翔宇等.2021年5月22日青海玛多Ms7.4级地震深部环境及发震构造模式[J].地球物理学报,2021,64(7):2232-2252.ZHAN Yan, LIANG Minjian, SUN Xiangyu, et al.Deep structure and seismogenic pattern of the 2021.5.22 Madoi(Qinghai)Ms7.4earthquake[J]. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 2021,64(7):2232-2252.(in Chinese)
[2] Liu Guangxun. Eastern Kunlun active fault zone and Its seismic activity[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 1996,4:46-55.
[3] 闻学泽, 杜方, 张培震, 等. 巴颜喀拉块体北和东边界大地震序列的关联性与2008年汶川地震[J]. 地球物理学报,2011, 54(3):706-716.WEN Xueze,DU Fang,ZHANG Peizhen, et al.Correlation of major earthquake sequences on the northern and eastern boundaries of the Bayan Har block,and its relation to the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Journal of Geophysics, 2011,54(3):706-716.(in Chinese)
[4] 江娃利, 谢新生. 东昆仑活动断裂带强震地表破裂分段特征[J]. 地质力学学报, 2006, 12(002):132-139.JIANGWali, XIE Xinsheng. Characteristics of segments of surface ruptures of strong earthquakes along the East Kunlun active fault zone[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2006, 12(002):132-139.(in Chinese)
[5] 邓起东, 朱艾斓, 高翔. 再议走滑断裂与地震孕育和发生条件[J].地震地质, 2014, 36(3):562-573.DENG Qidong, ZHU Ailan, GAO Xiang. Re-evaluation of seismogenic and occurrence conditions of large earthquakes on strike-slip faults[J].Seismology and Eeology,2014, 36(3):562-573.(in Chinese)
[6] Tan Y, Zhu L, Helmberger D V, et al. Locating and modeling regional earthquakes with two stations[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 2006, 111(B1).
[7] 易桂喜, 龙锋, 张致伟.汶川Ms8.0地震余震震源机制时空分布特[J].地球物理学报, 2012,55(4):213-227. YIGuixi, LONG Feng, ZHANG Zhiwei. Spatial and temporal variation of focal mechanisms for aftershocks of the 2008Ms8.0 Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2012,55(4):213-227.(in Chinese)
[8] 郑勇, 马宏生, 吕坚,等. 汶川地震强余震(Ms ≥ 5.6)的震源机制解及其与发震构造的关系[J]. 中国科学:D辑, 2009, 39(4):413-426.ZHENG Yong, MAHongsheng, LV Jian, et al. Focal mechanism solution of strong aftershocks (MS ≥ 5.6) of Wenchuan earthquake and its relationship with seismogenic structure[J]. Science in China(Series D), 2009, 39(4):413-426.(in Chinese)
[9] 陈继锋, 蒲举, 罗仁昱, 等. 海原及周边地区中小地震震源机制解研究[J]. 地震工程学报, 2020, 42(5):1049-1054.CHEN Jifeng, PU Ju, LUO Renyu, et al. Study on FocalMechanism of Moderate and Small Earthquakes in Haiyuan Area[J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 2020, 42(5):1049-1054.(in Chinese)
[10] 刘薇, 张硗清, 石玉成, 等.利用格林函数库计算2008年青海大柴旦6.4级地震的余震震源机制解[J]. 西北地震学报, 2012, 34(2):154-160.LIU Wei, ZHANGXiaoqing, SHI Yucheng,et al.Using Green function database and Quick moment tensor Inversion calculating the Focal mechanism solution of aftershocks of Dachaidan Ms6.4 earthquake in 2008 in Qinghai Province[J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 2012, 34(2):154-160.(in Chinese)
[11] 杨军, 苏有锦, 陈佳,等. 利用CAP方法快速计算云南地区中小地震震源机制解[J].中国地震, 2014, 30(4):551-559.YANG Jun, SUYoujing, CHEN Jia,et al. Fast CAP calculation of focal mechanism of moderate and small earthquake in the Yunnan Area[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 2014, 30(4):551-559.(in Chinese)
[12] 王周元.甘肃地区地壳分层结构[J]. 西北地震学报, 1984, 6(3):84-91.WANG Zhouyuan. Layered crustal structure in Gansu Region[J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 1984, 6(3):84-91.(in Chinese)
[13] 陈九辉, 刘启元, 李顺成, 等. 青藏高原东北缘-鄂尔多斯地块地壳上地幔S波速度结构[J].地球物理学报, 2005, 48(2):333-342.CHEN Jiuhui, LIU Qiyuan, LI Shuncheng, et al. Crust and upper mantle s-wave velocity structure across northeastern Tibetan Plateau and Ordos Block[J]. Chinese J Geophys. 2005, 48(2):333-342.(in Chinese)
[14] Laske, G, G. Masters, Z.T. Ma, et al. Update on CRUST1.0:A1 degree global model of earth’s crust. Geophys Res Abstracts 15, 2013, EGU 2013-2658.
[15] 屠泓为, 赵燕杰, 文勇,等.地震的震源机制解的计算和分析[J].地球物理学进展[J], 2012,127(1):0068-0074.TU Hongwei, ZHAO Yanjie, WEN Yong, et al.M ≥ 3.5 Eauthquake focal mechanism solution calculation and analysis since 2008 in Qinghai Dachaidan region[J]. Progress in Geophys.(in chinese), 2012, 127(1):0068-0074.(in Chinese)
[16] https://mp.weixin.qq.com/sbiz=MzU3NzE3MDE0MA==&mid=2247484496&idx=1&sn=cb68e7f8710f04ed43f623c84ba51eec&chksm=fd09fbe3ca
[17] 邓起东, 张培震, 冉勇康, 等.中国活动构造基本特征[J]. 中国科学(D辑:地球科学), 2002, 32(012):1020-1030.DENG Qidong, ZHANG Peizhen, RAN Yongkang, et al.Basic characteristics of active tectonics in China[J]. Scientia Sinica (Terrae),2002,32(012):1020-1030.(in Chinese)
[18] 姚琪, 程佳, 杨文. 大比例尺活动断裂数据在库伦应力计算中的应用[C], 2017,中国地球科学联合学术年会.
[19] 吴章明.内部张剪切断层与强震发生的构造部位[J].华北地震科学,1993, 11(1):11-18.WU Zhangming. Internal tensile shear fault and structural position of strong earthquake occurrence[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences,1993,11(1):11-18.(in Chinese)
[20] 韩竹君, 任伏虎, 小川雄二郎, 等. 1995年1月17日日本阪神7.2级地震的构造条件研究[J]. 地震学报,1996,18(4):523-528.HAN Zhujun, REN Fuhu, Yujiro Ogawa,et al.Research on the seismotectonics of the January 17,1995 Hanshin M7.2 earthquake[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,1996,18(4):523-528(in Chinese)
[21] Toda S, Stein R S, Sevilgen V, et al. Coulomb 3.3 graphic-rich deformation and stress-change software for earthquake, tectonic, and volcano research and teaching-User guide[J]. Open File Report, 2011.
[22] Stein R S, King G C P, Lin J. Change in failure stress on the southern San Andreas fault system caused by the 1992 magnitude=7.4 Landers earthquake[J]. Science, 1992, 258:1328-1332.
[23] 万永革, 吴忠良, 周公威, 等.几次复杂地震中不同破裂事件之间的"应力触发"问题[J].地震学报,2000, 22(6):568-576.WAN Yongge, WU Zhongliang, ZHOU Gongwei, et al. "Stress triggering" between different rupture events in several earthquakes[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2000, 22(6):568-576.(in Chinese)
[24] 傅征祥, 刘桂萍. 青藏高原北缘海原、古浪、昌马大地震间相互作用的动力学分析[J]. 地震地质, 2001, 23(1):35-42.FU Zhenxiang, LIU Guiping. Dynamic analysis on interaction between The Haiyuan-Gulang-Changma great earthquake in the northern boundary of Tibet Plateau[J]. Seismology and Egology, 2001, 23(1):35-42.(in Chinese)
[25] 王力伟. 静态库仑应力触发计算参数敏感性分析及应用研究[D]. 中国地局地震预测研究所, 2010:34-35.WANG Liwei. On uncertainty of Static Coulomb Stress Change triggering and its application[D]. Institute of Earthquake Forecasting, CEA, 2010:34-35.(in Chinese)
[26] 熊仁伟, 任金卫, 张军龙等. 玛多-甘德断裂甘德段晚第四纪活动特征[J]. 地震, 2010, 30(4):65-73.XIONG Renwei, REN Jinwei, ZHANG Junlong, et al. Late Quaternary Active Characteristics of the Gande Segment in the Maduo-Gande Fault Zone[J]. Earthquake, 2010, 30(4):65-73.(in Chinese)
[27] 万永革, 沈正康, 尚丹. 2005年10月巴基斯坦MW7.6地震对余震的触发研究[J].中国地震, 2006,22(3):277-286.WANYongge, SHEN Zhengkang, SHANG Dan. Study on triggering effect of the October,2005 Pakistan MW7.6 earthquake on its aftershocks[J]. Earthquake Research In China, 2006,22(3):277-286.(in Chinese)
[28] 韩竹军, 董绍鹏,谢富仁等.南北地震带北部5次(1561-1920年)M ≥ 7级地震触发关系研究[J].地球物理学报,2008,51(6):1776-1784.HAN Zhujun, DONG Shaopeng, XIE Furen, et al. Earthquake triggering by static stress:the 5 major earthquakes with M ≥ 7(1561-1920)in the northern section of South-north seismic zone, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2008,51(6):1776-1784.(in Chinese)

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-06-25;改回日期:2021-09-19。
基金项目:甘肃省地震局地震科技发展基金面上项目(2021M6);甘肃省青年科技基金计划项目(21JR7RA797)
作者简介:陈晓龙(1987-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事地震监测等研究工作.E-mail:chenxiaolonglz@163.com
通讯作者:蒲举(1985-),女,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事测震台网管理与运维工作.E-mail:312164762@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01