[1]罗若帆,郭迅,阿拉塔,等.漾濞6.4级地震外廊式教学楼震害调查与分析[J].世界地震工程,2021,(04):053-63.
 LUO Ruofan,GUO Xun,Alata,et al.Investigation and analysis of seismic damage to side corridor school buildings in M6.4 Yangbi earthquake[J].,2021,(04):053-63.
点击复制

漾濞6.4级地震外廊式教学楼震害调查与分析
分享到:

《世界地震工程》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
期数:
2021年04期
页码:
053-63
栏目:
出版日期:
2021-11-06

文章信息/Info

Title:
Investigation and analysis of seismic damage to side corridor school buildings in M6.4 Yangbi earthquake
作者:
罗若帆12 郭迅3 阿拉塔4 王波3 齐芳月3 董孝曜1
1. 中国地震局工程力学研究所, 中国地震局地震工程与工程振动重点实验室, 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080;
2. 嘉应学院 土木工程学院, 广东 梅州 514015;
3. 防灾科技学院 中国地震局建筑物破坏机理与防御重点实验室, 河北 三河 065201;
4. 云南省地震局, 云南 昆明 650041
Author(s):
LUO Ruofan12 GUO Xun3 Alata4 WANG Bo3 QI Fangyue3 DONG Xiaoyao1
1. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration;Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration of CEA, Harbin 150080, China;
2. School of Civil Engineering, Jiaying University, Meizhou 514015, China;
3. Institute of Disaster Prevention, Key Laboratory of Building Collapse Mechanism and Disaster Prevention, China Earthquake Administration, Sanhe 065201, China;
4. Earthquake Administration of Yunnan Province, Kunming 650041, China
关键词:
漾濞6.4级地震外廊式教学楼震害调查震害分析抗震能力
Keywords:
M6.4 Yangbi earthquakeside corridor school buildingseismic damage investigationseismic damage analysisseismic capacity
分类号:
TU375.4
摘要:
外廊式教学楼是中小学校典型的建筑形式。汶川地震后,外廊式教学楼震害引起大量研究人员重视。2021年5月21日21时48分,云南大理州漾濞县发生6.4级地震,本文作者详细调查了位于漾濞县的4所典型框架结构外廊式教学楼,以震害较为严重的漾濞一中和花椒园小学为例,分析了结构各部位发生破坏的原因。以震害现象为佐证,得出以下结论:由于横墙的约束,楼板沿纵向平动,各轴构件的本构关系可在同一坐标系下进行对比分析,结构破坏取决于构件沿纵向的极限位移。并在此基础上,从新的角度探讨了多层建筑的抗震能力。
Abstract:
Side corridor school building is a typical building style in primary and secondary schools. After Wenchuan earthquake, the earthquake damage of side corridor school buildings has attracted a lot of researchers’ attention. An M6.4 earthquake happened in Yangbi County, Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan Province at 21:48 on May 21, 2021. The authors in this paper surveyed 4 typical RC frame side corridor school buildings located in Yangbi County. Taking Yangbi No.1 Middle School and Huajiaoyuan Elementary School as examples, the causes of the damage in each component of the structures were analyzed. Based on the earthquake damage, the following conclusions are drawn: Due to the restriction of the transverse wall, the floor moves along the longitudinal direction and the constitutive relations of the members of each axis can be compared and analyzed in the same coordinate system. The failure of the structure depends on the ultimate deformation capacity of the member along the longitudinal direction. On this basis, the seismic capacity of the structures is discussed from a new perspective.

参考文献/References:

[1] Paulay T, Priestley M. J. N. Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings[M]. New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1992.
[2] 郭迅. 汶川大地震震害特点与成因分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,2009, 29(6):74-87.GUO Xun.Characteristics and mechanism analysis of the great Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2009, 29(6):74-87. (in Chinese)
[3] 闫培雷, 孙柏涛, 张昊宇. 芦山7.0级强烈地震钢筋混凝土框架结构教学楼震害[J]. 土木工程学报, 2014, 47(S1):24-28.YAN Peilei, SUN Baitao and ZHANG Haoyu. Seismic damage to RC frame teaching buildings in Lushan MS7.0 earthquake[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2014, 47(S1):24-28. (in Chinese)
[4] 仉国栋, 才仁昂布, 杨青顺, 等. 玉树地震建筑震害分析[J]. 青海大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 31(6):91-98.ZHANG Guodong, Cairen Angbu, YANG Qingshun, et al. Analysis of building structure damage in Yushu earthquake[J]. Journal of Qinghai University (Natural Science Edition), 2013,31(6):91-98. (in Chinese)
[5] 潘毅, 张弛, 高宪, 等. 台湾美浓6.7级地震框架结构震害调查与分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2016, 49(S1):13-18.PAN Yi, ZHANG Chi, CAO Xian, et al.Earthquake damage investigation and analysis of the RC frame structures in Taiwan Meinung Ms 6.7 earthquake[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2016, 49(S1):13-18. (in Chinese)
[6] 潘毅, 季晨龙, 王超, 等. 日本地震中钢筋混凝土框架结构震害及分析[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造, 2012, 34(4):122-127+133.PAN Yi, JI Chenlong, WANG Chao, et al. Seismic damage analysis of the reinforced concrete frame structures in Japanese earthquake[J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting, 2012,34(4):122-127+133. (in Chinese)
[7] SEZEN H, WHITTAKER A S, ELWOOD K J, et al. Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the August 17, 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey earthquake, and seismic design and construction practise in Turkey[J]. Engineering Structures 25(2003) 103-114.
[8] 叶列平, 曲哲, 马千里, 等. 从汶川地震框架结构震害谈"强柱弱梁"屈服机制的实现[J]. 建筑结构, 2008(11):52-59+67. YE Lieping, QU Zhe, MA Qianli, et al. Study on ensuring the strong column-weak beam mechanism for RC frames based on the damage analysis in the Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Building Structure, 2008(11):52-59+67. (in Chinese)
[9] 李巨文, 薄景山, 卢滔, 等.玉树7.1级地震学校建筑震害分析[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2013, 22(1):123-129.LI Juwen, BO Jingshan, LU Tao, et al. Seismic damage analysis of school buildings in Yushu Ms7.1 earthquake[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2013, 22(1):123-129. (in Chinese)
[10] 薄景山, 李孝波, 段玉石, 等. 九寨沟7.0级地震学校建筑震害调查与分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2018, 38(5):120-128.BO Jingshan, LI Xiaobo, DUAN Yushi, et al. Investigation and analysis of seismic damage to school buildings in Ms 7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2018, 38(5):120-128. (in Chinese)
[11] 王涛, 雷远德, 张永群, 等. 芦山地震中校舍建筑的震害特点与分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2013, 33(3):36-47.WANG Tao, LEI Yuande, ZHANG Yongqun, et al. Seismic damage analysis of school buildings in Lushan earthquake[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2013, 33(3):36-47. (in Chinese)
[12] 马玉虎, 陆新征, 叶列平, 等. 漩口中学典型框架结构震害模拟与分析[J]. 工程力学, 2011, 28(5):71-77.MA Yuhu, LU Xinzheng, YE Lieping, et al. Seismic damage simulation and analysis of typical RC frames of Xuankou school[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2011, 28(5):71-77. (in Chinese)
[13] 杨玉成, 孙柏涛. 论多层砖砌体住宅楼的抗倒设计——汶川地震映秀镇漩口中学宿舍楼震害探究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2010, 30(6):1-12.YANG Yucheng, SUNBaitao. On seismic collapse-resistant design of multi-story brick masonry buildings:Finding the causes of seismic damage to multi-story hostels of Xuankou Middle School in Yingxiu Town during Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2010, 30(6):1-12. (in Chinese)
[14] 王波, 郭迅, 宣越, 等. 设置半高连续填充墙的RC框架结构地震倒塌振动台试验[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2021, 29(3):656-668.WANG Bo, GUO Xun, XUAN Yue, et al. Shaking table test on collapse mechanism of RC frame with continuous half-height infilled walls[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2021, 29(3):656-668. (in Chinese)
[15] 杨伟松,陶柱,郭迅,许卫晓,张纪刚.填充墙外廊式RC框架结构倒塌振动台试验研究[J/OL].建筑结构学报:1-14[2021-07-26]. https://doi.org/10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2020.0716.YANG Weisong, TAO Zhu, GUO Xun, et al. Shaking table collapse test on exterior corridor RC frame with infill walls[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 1-14[2021-07-26]. https://doi.org/10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2020.0716. (in Chinese)

相似文献/References:

[1]刘金龙,丁勇,林均岐.云南漾濞6.4级地震交通系统震害调查分析[J].世界地震工程,2021,(03):031.
 LIU Jinlong,DING Yong,LIN Junqi.Investigation and analysis of the damage of traffic system under Yangbi Ms6.4 earthquake in Yunnan[J].,2021,(04):031.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-07-29;改回日期:2021-10-02。
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC1504302-3);国家自然科学基金面上项目(51478117);中国地震局建筑物破坏机理与防御重点实验室开放基金(FZ211201)
作者简介:罗若帆(1988-),博士研究生,讲师,主要从事结构抗震研究.E-mail:149721299@qq.com
通讯作者:郭迅(1966-),博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事结构抗震研究.E-mail:guoxun@iem.ac.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01