[1]周彬,宗刚,周球尚.宜宾双河文庙震损模拟及抗震分析[J].世界地震工程,2023,39(01):069-77.[doi:10.19994/j.cnki.WEE.2023.0008]
 ZHOU Bin,ZONG Gan,ZHOU Qiushang.Earthquake damage simulation and seismic analysis of Shuanghe Confucious Temple in Yibin[J].,2023,39(01):069-77.[doi:10.19994/j.cnki.WEE.2023.0008]
点击复制

宜宾双河文庙震损模拟及抗震分析
分享到:

《世界地震工程》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
39
期数:
2023年01期
页码:
069-77
栏目:
常规论文
出版日期:
2023-02-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Earthquake damage simulation and seismic analysis of Shuanghe Confucious Temple in Yibin
文章编号:
1007-6069(2023)01-0069-09
作者:
周彬1宗刚2周球尚3
1.同济大学建筑设计研究院(集团)有限公司,上海200092;2.同济大学土木工程国家重点实验室,上海200092;3.上海递革检测科技有限公司,上海200092
Author(s):
ZHOU Bin1 ZONG Gan2 ZHOU Qiushang3
1. Tongji Architectural Design(Group)Co., Ltd, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Shanghai Digger Inspection Technology Ltd, Shanghai 200092, China
关键词:
木结构 历史建筑 融合监测台阵 震损模拟 抗震分析
Keywords:
timber structure historical architecture structure-ground seismological array earthquake damage simulation seismic analysis
分类号:
TU366.2
DOI:
10.19994/j.cnki.WEE.2023.0008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
2019年6月17日宜宾双河发生M6.0级地震,造成了距离震中仅5km的双河文庙建筑东北侧上檐翼角损坏和西侧局部斜撑脱落等局部损坏。双河文庙是典型的木结构文保历史建筑,开展相关震害和抗震分析具有重要意义。以近期在周边建立的场地-建筑强震反应融合监测台站获取的强震记录作为类比输入,进行结构地震反应仿真分析,结果表明:该木结构的整体刚度偏小,易发生扭转破坏,在7度中震和大震作用时,结构扭转效效极易引发挑檐处榫卯节点破坏,与实际震害情况吻合,该类结构宜适度补强纵向抗侧刚度,增强整体抗扭能力。
Abstract:
M6.0 earthquake occurred at Shuanghe town on June 17,2019. Confucious Temple is a typical historical timber architecture, located in Shuanghe town which is only 5km away from the epicenter of M6.0 earthquake. Eaves on wing corner of northeast side and bracing of west side were found to be partially damaged. After the earthquake, Confucious Temple was repaired with retrofitting. The structural model of Confucious Temple was established for calculation and analysis. It is found that the whole stiffness is not strong and easily excited with torsion. Using the strong earthquake record of the structure-ground seismological array which is recently established nearby, the structural damage caused by Shuanghe Earthquake is recurred. The structural analysis under fortification intensity 7 is done. It can be proved that torsional damage is easily occurred in the timber structure. And the mortise-tenon joints are easily damaged under the function of the vertical vibration and the horizontal vibration.

参考文献/References:

[1] GB/T 17742-2020中国地震烈度表[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2020.
GB/T 17742-2020 The Chinese Seismic Intensity Scale[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press,2020.(in Chinese)
[2] 潘毅, 陈建, 包韵雷, 等. 长宁6.0级地震村镇建筑震害调查与分析[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2020, 41(增刊1): 297-306.
PAN Yi, CHEN Jian, BAO Yunlei, et al. Seismic damage investigation and analysis of rural buildings in MS6.0 Changning earthquake[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2020, 41(S1): 297-306.(in Chinese)
[3] GB 50165-2020古建筑木结构维护与加固技术规范[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2020.
GB 50165-2020 Technical Code for Maintenance and Strengthening of Ancient Timber Buildings[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press,2020.(in Chinese)
[4] 龙卫国. 木结构设计手册[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2005.
LONG Weiguo. Wood Structure Design Manual[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & BuildingPress, 2005.(in Chinese)
[5] 淳庆, 吕伟, 王建国, 等. 江浙地区抬梁和穿斗木构体系典型榫卯节点受力性能[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 45(1): 151-158.
CHUN Qing, LV Wei, WANG Jianguo, et al. Mechanical properties of typical mortise-tenon joints of post and lintel construction and column and tie construction of timber buildings in Jiangsu Province and Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition), 2015, 45(1): 151-158.(in Chinese)
[6] 淳庆, 潘建伍, 韩宜丹. 江南地区传统木构建筑半榫节点受力性能研究[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 43(1): 124-131.
CHUN Qing, PAN Jianwu, HAN Yidan. Research on mechanical properties of ban mortise-tenon joint of the traditional timber buildings in the south Yangtze River regions[J]. Journal of Hunan University(Natural Sciences), 2016, 43(1): 124-131.(in Chinese)
[7] 胡卫兵, 韩广森, 于海平. 古建筑卯榫节点刚度分析[J]. 四川建筑科学研究,2011, 37(6): 44-47.
HU Weibing, HAN Guangsen, YU Haiping. The analysis about node stiffness of mortise and tenon in ancient building [J]. Sichuan Building Science. 2011, 37(6):44-47.(in Chinese)
[8] DB/T 64-2016 强震动观测技术规程[S]. 北京: 地震出版社,2017.
DB/T 64-2016 Technical Regulations for Strong Motion Observation[S]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 2017.(in Chinese)
[9] 王娟, 杨娜, 杨庆山. 适用于遗产建筑的结构健康监测系统[J]. 北京交通大学学报, 2010, 34(1): 100-104.
WANG Juan, YANG Na, YANG Qingshan. Structural health monitoring system for heritage buildings[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 2010, 34(1): 100-104.(in Chinese)
[10] 戴俭, 刘科. 基于传统木构建筑健康安全监测与全信息采集、利用的物联网技术需求的思考[J]. 文物保护与考古科学, 2011, 23(3): 39-47.
DAI Jian, LIU Ke. IOT technology based on the safety monitoring and information collection and utilization of traditional wooden construction[J]. Sciences of Conservation and Archaeology, 2011, 23(3): 39-47.(in Chinese)
[11] 杨庆山.古建筑木结构的承载及抗震机理[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文), 2022, 44(2): 1-9.
YANG Qingshan. Load-bearing and aseismic mechanism of traditional wooden structures[J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2022, 44(2): 1-9.(in Chinese)
[12] 金昱成, 苏何先, 潘文, 等.木结构榫卯节点抗震性能及加固对比试验研究[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文), 2022, 44(2): 138-147.
JIN Yucheng, SU Hexian, PAN Wen, et al. Experimental research on seismic performance and reinforcement comparison of mortise-tenon joints in timber structures[J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2022, 44(2): 138-147.(in Chinese)
[13] 曹璞琳, 刘卫华, 程枭翀, 等.午门城台结构受力性能的主要影响因素[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文), 2022, 44(2): 205-214.
CAO Pulin, LIU Weihua, CHENG Xiaochong, et al. Main influential factors in mechanical performance of Meridian Gate platform structure[J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2022, 44(2): 205-214.(in Chinese)

相似文献/References:

[1]赵鸿铁,薛自波,薛建阳,等.古建筑木结构构架加固试验研究[J].世界地震工程,2010,(02):072.
 ZHAO Hongtie,XUE Zibo,XUE Jianyang,et al.The experimental study on reinforcement frame of ancient timber structures[J].,2010,(01):072.
[2]隋䶮,赵鸿铁,薛建阳,等.古建筑木结构直榫和燕尾榫节点试验研究[J].世界地震工程,2010,(02):088.
 SUI Yan,ZHAO Hongtie,XUE Jianyang,et al.Experimental study on characteristics of mortise-tenon joints in historic timber buildings[J].,2010,(01):088.
[3]孟昭博,吴敏哲,胡卫兵,等.考虑土-结构相互作用的西安钟楼地震反应分析[J].世界地震工程,2008,(4):125.
 MENG Zhaobo,WU Minzhe,HU Weibing,et al.Seismic response analysis of Xi’an Bell Tower condidering soil-structure interation[J].,2008,(01):125.
[4]李小伟,赵均海,孙姗姗,等.侧脚与斗拱对清代九檩大式殿堂动力性能的影响[J].世界地震工程,2009,(03):145.
 LI Xiaowei,ZHAO Junhai,SUN Shanshan,et al.Seismic perfournauce of a timber frame palace with Nine-purlin in Qing Dynasty[J].,2009,(01):145.
[5]隋䶮,赵鸿铁,薛建阳,等.古建木构枓栱侧向刚度的试验研究[J].世界地震工程,2009,(04):145.
 SUI Yan,ZHAO Hongtie,XUE Jianyang,et al.Experiment study on lateral stiffness of an ancient wooden Dougong[J].,2009,(01):145.
[6]宋晓胜,苏经宇,郭小东,等.中国木结构古建筑榫卯连接节点抗震性能研究进展[J].世界地震工程,2014,(01):012.
 SONG Xiaosheng,SU Jingyu,GUO Xiaodong,et al.A Review of research on seismic performance of mortise-tenon joints in Chinese ancient timber buildings[J].,2014,(01):012.
[7]宋晓胜,苏经宇,郭小东.中国木结构传统建筑典型震害分析与保护对策[J].世界地震工程,2014,(02):043.
 SONG Xiaosheng,SU Jingyu,GUO Xiaodong.Analysis of seismic damage to traditional Chinese timber buldings and their protection conntermeasures[J].,2014,(01):043.
[8]徐明刚,邱洪兴.中国明清两代木结构框架抗震试验研究[J].世界地震工程,2014,(02):155.
 XU Minggang,QIU Hongxing.Experimental study on seismic behavior of wooden frame structures in the Ming and Qing Dynasties of China[J].,2014,(01):155.
[9]田鹏刚,张风亮.古建筑木结构震害分析及加固研究[J].世界地震工程,2014,(03):126.
 TIAN Penggang ZHANG Fengliang.Seismic damage analysis and strengthening methods of ancient timber structures[J].,2014,(01):126.
[10]童丽萍,邬伟进.太昊陵显仁殿结构动力性能分析[J].世界地震工程,2015,(04):023.
 TONG Liping,WU Weijin.Dynamic performance analysis of the Xianren Temple in Taihao Mausoleum[J].,2015,(01):023.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-12-15; 修回日期:2022-04-28
作者简介:周 彬(1980 —),男,高级工程师,工学博士,主要从事结构修缮加固和结构健康监测研究. E-mail:ebinzb@163.com
通讯作者:宗 刚(1977 —),男,讲师,工学博士,主要从事强震与振动智能观测研究. E-mail:zong@tongji.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01