[1](庙 成,王 骏,林虹宇,等.基于F-D曲线法的中国大陆地区地震灾害经济可接受风险研究[J].世界地震工程,2023,39(02):001-10.[doi:10.19994/j.cnki.WEE.2023.0024]
　(MIAO Cheng,WANG Jun,LIN Hongyu,et al.Economic acceptable risk of earthquake disasters in Chinese Mainland based on F-D curve method[J].,2023,39(02):001-10.[doi:10.19994/j.cnki.WEE.2023.0024]
点击复制

基于F-D曲线法的中国大陆地区地震灾害经济可接受风险研究
分享到：

《世界地震工程》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
39
期数:
2023年02期
页码:
001-10
栏目:
专栏：地震灾害风险评估和区划与情景构建
出版日期:
2023-05-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Economic acceptable risk of earthquake disasters in Chinese Mainland based on F-D curve method
文章编号:
1007-6069(2023)02-0001-10
作者:
(庙 成; 王 骏2; 林虹宇3; 杨江涛4)
1. 宁夏师范学院 资源环境与生命科学学院, 宁夏 固原 756000; 2. 自然资源部地质灾害自动化监测技术创新中心, 重庆地质矿产研究院, 重庆 401120; 3. 四川省宜宾市长宁县应急管理局, 四川 长宁 644300; 4. 四川省自贡市自然资源和规划局, 四川 自贡 643000
Author(s):
(MIAO Cheng1;  WANG Jun2;  LIN Hongyu3;  YANG Jiangtao4)
1. School of Resources Environment and Life Sciences, Ningxia Normal University, Guyuan 756000, China; 2. Technology Innovation Center of Geohazards Automatic Monitoring, Ministry of Natural Resources, Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chongqing 401120, China; 3. Changning Emergency Management Bureau of Yibin, Changning 644300, China; 4. Zigong Municipal Bureau of Natural )/(Resources and Planning, Zigong 643000, China
关键词:
可接受风险;  风险标准;  经济风险;  直接经济损失;  地震灾害
Keywords:
acceptable risk;  risk criteria;  economic risk;  direct economic loss;  earthquake disaster
分类号:
P315.9;X915.5
DOI:
10.19994/j.cnki.WEE.2023.0024
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
合理的地震灾害经济可接受风险水平可以有效管理防灾减灾的投入。基于1991～2020年中国大陆地区地震灾害经济损失数据,利用F-D曲线法(Frequency-Damage curve),建立不同震级(MS<5.0、MS5.0～5.9、MS6.0～6.9和MS≥7.0)和不同灾情等级(微灾、小灾、中灾、大灾和巨灾)的地震灾害经济可接受风险曲线,并以此为标准讨论30年间由地震产生直接经济损失事件的可接受风险等级。研究结果表明:中国大陆地区地震灾害造成0.020亿元直接经济损失的灾损率不超过1.29×10-2/a为可接受经济风险,直接经济损失超过14.763亿元其灾损率为任意值均是不可接受经济风险。由此判断,30年间有18.07%的地震灾害属于不可接受经济风险事件。同理,不同震级和不同灾情等级地震灾害的可接受经济风险水平也被确定,并得到MS<5.0、MS5.0～5.9、MS6.0～6.9和MS≥7.0地震灾害分别有23.91%、27.45%、34.78%和30.77%的事件属于不可接受经济风险,微灾、小灾、中灾、大灾和巨灾地震分别有56.00%、48.62%、41.73%、40.00%和44.44%的事件属于不可接受经济风险。该研究结果可以为我国地震灾害经济风险的防范提供相关的理论和实践支撑。
Abstract:
Reasonable economic acceptable risk level of earthquake disaster can effectively manage the investment of disaster prevention and mitigation. Based on the economic loss data of earthquake disasters in mainland China from 1991 to 2020, the F-D curve method(Frequency-Damage curve)is used to establish the economic acceptable risk curve of earthquake disasters with different magnitudes(MS <5.0, MS 5.0～5.9, MS 6.0～6.9 and MS ≥7.0)and different disaster levels(micro-disaster, small-disaster, medium-disaster, large-disaster and catastrophe). And on this standard, the acceptable risk level of direct economic loss events caused by earthquakes in 30 years is discussed. The results show that the direct economic loss of 0.002 billion yuan caused by earthquake disasters in mainland China is acceptable if the damage rate does not exceed 1.29×10-2/a, direct economic loss of more than 1.4763 billion yuan of its damage rate for any value is unacceptable economic risk. It can be judged that 18.07% of the earthquake disasters in 30 years are unacceptable economic risk events. Similarly, the acceptable economic risk level of earthquake disasters with different magnitudes and different disaster levels was also determined. It was found that 23.91%, 27.45%, 34.78% and 30.77% of the events with MS <5.0, MS 5.0～5.9, MS 6.0～6.9 and MS ≥7.0 earthquake disasters were unacceptable economic risks respectively, and 56.00%, 48.62%, 41.73%, 40.00% and 44.44% of the events with micro-earthquake, small-earthquake, medium-earthquake, large-earthquake and catastrophe earthquake disasters were unacceptable economic risks respectively. The research results can provide relevant theoretical and practical support for the prevention of economic risk of earthquake disasters in China.

参考文献/References:

[1] LIND N. Social and economic criteria of acceptable risk[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2002, 78(1): 21-25.
[2] UNDRR. Human cost of disasters: An overview of the last 20 years 2000—2019 [R]. Geneva Switzerland: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020.
[3] SONG Q H, LIU D S, WU Y X. Study on the acceptable and tolerable risk criteria for landslide hazards in the mainland of China [C]∥ ISGSR2007 First International Symposium on Geotechnical Safety & Risk, Shanghai, 2007.
[4] 尚志海. 泥石流灾害综合风险货币化评估及可接受风险研究[D]. 广州: 中山大学, 2012.
SHANG Zhihai. Monetary evaluation of debris flow disaster integrated risk and acceptable risk study[D]. Guangzhou: Sun Yat-sen University, 2012.(in Chinese)
[5] SUI H Y, HU R L, GAO W, et al. Risk assessment of individual landslide based on the risk acceptable model: A case study of the Shiyantan landslide in Mayang County, China[J]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2020, 26(9): 2500-2519.
[6] 巩尚卿, 叶四桥, 杨威. 落石灾害危险性概率评价方法[J]. 灾害学, 2014, 29(4): 215-219.
GONG Shangqing, YE Siqiao, YANG Wei. Evaluation method for probability of rockfall hazard[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2014, 29(4): 215-219.(in Chinese)
[7] 赵阳, 倪化勇, 张泰丽, 等. 浙江丽水地区地质灾害风险可接受程度[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2022, 22(3): 953-959.
ZHAO Yang, NI Huayong, ZHANG Taili, et al. Risk acceptability of geological disasters in Lishui, Zhejiang[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2022, 22(3): 953-959.(in Chinese)
[8] 于汐, 薄景山, 唐彦东. 重大岩土工程可接受风险标准研究[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2018, 27(3): 56-67.
YU Xi, BO Jingshan, TANG Yandong. Study on risk acceptance criteria of major geotechnical project[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2018, 27(3): 56-67.(in Chinese)
[9] 周兴波, 周建平, 杜效鹄, 等. 我国大坝可接受风险标准研究[J]. 水力发电学报, 2015, 34(1): 63-72.
ZHOU Xingbo, ZHOU Jianping, DU Xiaohu, et al. Study on risk acceptance criteria for dams in China[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2015, 34(1): 63-72.(in Chinese)
[10] 尚志海, 刘希林. 国外可接受风险标准研究综述[J]. 世界地理研究, 2010, 19(3): 72-80.
SHANG Zhihai, LIU Xilin. Overviews on foreign acceptable risk criteria[J]. World Regional Studies, 2010, 19(3): 72-80.(in Chinese)
[11] SIM K B, LEE M L, WONG S Y. A review of landslide acceptable risk and tolerable risk[J]. Geoenvironmental Disasters, 2022, 9(1): 3.
[12] 庙成, 王骏. 中国大陆地区MS≥5.0地震灾害生命可接受风险标准研究[J]. 世界地震工程, 2022, 38(4): 18-25.
MIAO Cheng, WANG Jun. Life risk acceptability criteria for MS≥5.0 earthquake disaster in Chinese Mainland[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2022, 38(4): 18-25.(in Chinese)
[13] 国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 1991-2021.
National Bureau of Statistics. Statistical Yearbook of China[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 1991-2021.(in Chinese)
[14] 中国地震局. 中国地震年鉴 [M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1991-2020.
China Earthquake Administration. China Earthquake Yearbook [M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1991—2020.(in Chinese)
[15] 中国地震局震灾应急救援司. 中国大陆地震灾害损失评估汇编 [M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1990-2010.
Department of Earthquake Disaster Emergency Management, CEA. Compilation of Earthquake Disaster Loss Assessment in Chinese Mainland [M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1990-2010.(in Chinese)
[16] 中国地震局. 地震事件回顾 [EB/OL]. https:∥www.cea.gov.cn/cea/xwzx/ zyzt/3ffebdb3-1. html.
China Earthquake Administration. Review of earthquake events [EB/OL]. https:∥www.cea.gov.cn/cea/xwzx/ zyzt/3ffebdb3-1. html.(in Chinese)
[17] FARMER F. Siting criteria: A new approach[J].Atom, 1967, 128(1): 152-170.
[18] HSE. Transport fatal accidents and FN-curves: 1967—2001 [R]. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 2003.
[19] 赵阿兴, 马宗晋. 自然灾害损失评估指标体系的研究[J]. 自然灾害学报, 1993, 2(3): 1-7.
ZHAO Axing, MA Zongjin. Appraising study for the loss evaluation system of natural disasters [J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 1993, 2(3): 1-7.(in Chinese)
[20] 温姗姗, 翟建青, THOMAS Fischer, 等. 1984—2014年影响中国热带气旋的经济损失标准化及其变化特征[J]. 热带气象学报, 2017, 33(4): 478-487.
WEN Shanshan, ZHAI Jianqing, FISCHER T, et al. Variation of normalized economic losses from influential tropical cyclones in China for 1984—2014[J]. Journal of Tropical Meteorology, 2017, 33(4): 478-487.(in Chinese)
[21] 徐国栋, 薄景山, 李巨文, 等. 基于双损失指标的地震灾度模型[J]. 中国地震, 2022, 38(2): 304-314.
XU Guodong, BO Jingshan, LI Juwen, et al. Seismic disaster magnitude model based on double loss indicators[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 2022, 38(2): 304-314.(in Chinese)
[22] 高华喜, 殷坤龙. 基于GIS的滑坡灾害风险空间预测[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2011, 20(1): 31-36.
GAO Huaxi, YIN Kunlong. GIS-based spatial prediction of landslide hazard risk[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2011, 20(1): 31-36.(in Chinese)

相似文献/References:

[1]刘莉,谢礼立,葛红.城市防震减灾能力评价中的可接受风险研究[J].世界地震工程,2009,(01):082.
　LIU Li,XIE Lili,GE Hong.Research on acceptable risk level for the urban capacity of earthquake disaster prevention and reduction[J].,2009,(02):082.
[2]庙成,王骏.中国大陆地区MS ≥ 5.0地震灾害生命可接受风险标准研究[J].世界地震工程,2022,38(04):018.[doi:10.19994/j.cnki.WEE.2022.0078]
　MIAO Cheng,WANG Jun.Life risk acceptability criteria for MS ≥ 5.0 earthquake disaster in Chinese Mainland[J].,2022,38(02):018.[doi:10.19994/j.cnki.WEE.2022.0078]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-12-02; 修回日期:2022-12-28
基金项目:宁夏哲学社会科学规划项目(引才专项)(20NXRCC15); 宁夏优秀人才支持计划资助(2021年第六批宁夏回族自治区青年科技人才托举工程)
作者简介:庙 成(1989—),男,副教授,博士,主要从事自然灾害风险评估、可接受风险分析与灾害教育方面研究. E-mail:miaocheng19890922@163.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01