[1](周 强,夏 贇,赵文洋,等.考虑主余震序列作用的砌体结构易损性分析[J].世界地震工程,2023,39(02):052-61.[doi:10.19994/j.cnki.WEE.2023.0029 ]
　(ZHOU Qiang,XIA Yun,ZHAO Wenyang,et al.Vulnerability analysis of masonry structure considering sequence of mainshock-aftershock[J].,2023,39(02):052-61.[doi:10.19994/j.cnki.WEE.2023.0029 ]
点击复制

考虑主余震序列作用的砌体结构易损性分析
分享到：

《世界地震工程》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
39
期数:
2023年02期
页码:
052-61
栏目:
常规论文
出版日期:
2023-05-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Vulnerability analysis of masonry structure considering sequence of mainshock-aftershock
文章编号:
1007-6069(2023)02-0052-10
作者:
(周 强; 夏 贇; 赵文洋; 郭倩勤)
南昌大学 工程建设学院,江西 南昌 330031
Author(s):
(ZHOU Qiang;  XIA Yun;  ZHAO Wenyang;  GUO Qianqin)
School of Infrastructure Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China
关键词:
主余震序列;  砌体结构;  IDA分析;  整体损伤耗能;  易损性分析
Keywords:
sequence of mainshock-aftershock;  masonry structure;  IDA analysis;  overall damage energy dissipation;  vulnerability analysis
分类号:
TU365;X37
DOI:
10.19994/j.cnki.WEE.2023.0029
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
鉴于我国砌体结构抗震面临的严峻形势,以及主余震序列作用下砌体结构易损性研究存在的不足,以汶川地震中1栋典型砌体房屋为依托,开展考虑主余震序列作用的砌体结构易损性研究。首先,建立了结构的三维有限元模型,并从结构动力特性与损伤等方面验证了模型的合理性; 其次,选取整体损伤耗能作为结构性能参数,并给出了对应不同破坏等级的结构整体损伤耗能界限值; 最后,基于IDA方法对结构进行了不同主余震序列作用下的易损性分析。结果表明:相对于层间位移角,整体损伤耗能更适用于描述余震对结构的累积损伤效应; 随着结构主震损伤程度的加深,余震对结构造成的影响越明显,且主余震序列作用下结构呈现出比主震单独作用下高一个破坏等级的趋势; 当ΔPGA小于0.6时,结构的极限状态超越概率最大增幅不超过10%,此时余震的影响较小; 当ΔPGA大于0.6时,结构的极限状态超越概率最大增幅可达到33.1%,此时余震的影响较大。
Abstract:
In view of the severe situation faced by masonry structures in China in terms of earthquake resistance, and the shortcomings in the research on vulnerability of masonry structures under the action of mainshock-aftershock, based on a typical masonry house in the Wenchuan earthquake, a study on the vulnerability of masonry structures considering the action of the sequence of mainshock-aftershock was carried out. Firstly, a three-dimensional finite element model of the structure is established, and the rationality of the model is verified from the aspects of structural dynamic characteristics and damage; secondly, the overall damage energy dissipation is selected as the structural performance parameter, and the overall structure corresponding to different damage levels is given. The overall damage energy dissipation limit value; finally, the vulnerability analysis of the structure under the action of different sequence of mainshock-aftershocks is carried out based on the IDA method. The results show that the overall damage energy dissipation is more suitable for describing the cumulative damage effect of aftershocks on the structure than the interstory displacement angle. The lower structure shows a trend of a higher damage level than that under the action of the main shock alone; when ΔPGA is less than 0.6, the maximum increase in the limit state exceeding probability of the structure does not exceed 10%, and the impact of aftershocks is small at this time; when ΔPGA is greater than 0.6, the maximum increase in the probability of exceeding the limit state of the structure can reach 33.1%, and the impact of aftershocks is greater at this time.

参考文献/References:

[1] 李宏男, 肖诗云, 霍林生. 汶川地震震害调查与启示[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2008, 29(4): 10-19.
LI Hongnan, XIAO Shiyun, HUO Linsheng. Damage investigation and analysis of engineering structures in the Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2008, 29(4): 10-19.(in Chinese)
[2] 曲哲, 杨永强. 尼泊尔自建民居在2015年地震序列中的震害[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2015, 35(4): 51-59.
QU Zhe, YANG Yongqiang. Seismic damages to owner-built dwellings in the 2015 earthquake sequence in Nepal[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2015, 35(4): 51-59.(in Chinese)
[3] HOSSEINPOUR F, Abdelnaby A E. Effect of different aspects of multiple earthquakes on the nonlinear behavior of RC structures[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 92: 706-725.
[4] Wen W P, Zhai C H, Ji D F, et al. Framework for the vulnerability assessment of structure under mainshock-aftershock sequences[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 101: 41-52.
[5] HATZIVASSILIOU M, Hatzigeorgiou G D. Seismic sequence effects on three-dimensional reinforced concrete buildings[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 72: 77-88.
[6] HATZIGEORGIOU G D, LIOLIOS A A. Nonlinear behaviour of RC frames under repeated strong ground motions[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 30(10): 1010-1025.
[7] LI Q W, ELLINGWOOD B R. Performance evaluation and damage assessment of steel frame buildings under main shock-aftershock earthquake sequences[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2007, 36(3): 405-427.
[8] 杨福剑, 王国新. 主余震序列型地震动作用下RC框架结构损伤耗能研究[J]. 世界地震工程, 2019, 35(1): 45-52.
YANG Fujian, WANG Guoxin. Damage energy dissipation analysis of RC frame structure under mainshock-aftershock sequence-type ground motions[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 35(1): 45-52.(in Chinese)
[9] 周洲, 于晓辉, 吕大刚. 主余震序列作用下钢筋混凝土框架结构的易损性分析及安全评估[J]. 工程力学, 2018, 35(11): 134-145.
ZHOU Zhou, YU Xiaohui, LU Dagang. Fragility analysis and safety evaluation of reinforced concrete frame structures subjected to mainshock-aftershock earthquake sequences[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 35(11): 134-145.(in Chinese)
[10] RINALDIN G, AMADIO C. Effects of seismic sequences on masonry structures[J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 166: 227-239.
[11] 周强, 陈东, 肖晖, 等. 主余震序列型地震动下典型村镇砌体结构抗震性能分析[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2022, 31(2): 84-92.
ZHOU Qiang, CHEN Dong, XIAO Hui, et al. Seismic performance analysis of masonry structure in typical villages and towns under mainshock-aftershock sequence ground motion[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2022, 31(2): 84-92.(in Chinese)
[12] 熊立红, 官志刚, 吴善香. 基于增量动力分析方法的砌体结构地震易损性分析[J]. 世界地震工程, 2022, 38(1): 11-19.
XIONG Lihong, GUAN Zhigang, WU Shanxiang. Seismic fragility analysis of masonry structures based on incremental dynamic analysis[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2022, 38(1): 11-19.(in Chinese)
[13] 张永群, 蒋利学, 王卓琳. 基于性能的多层砌体结构地震易损性分析[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2021, 42(5): 64-71.
ZHAGN Yongqun, JIANG Lixue, WANG Zhuolin. Performance-based seismic vulnerability analysis of multi-story masonry structures[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2021, 42(5): 64-71.(in Chinese)
[14] 赵桂峰, 马玉宏, 陈小飞. 村镇建筑基于性态标准的地震易损性分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2014, 47(9): 1-8.
ZHAO Guifeng, MA Yuhong, CHEN Xiaofei. Vulnerability analysis of performance-based seismic design criteria for rural buildings[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2014, 47(9): 1-8.(in Chinese)
[15] GB 50010—2010混凝土结构设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2015.
GB 50010—2010 Code for Design of Concrete Structures[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building press, 2015.(in Chinese)
[16] 朱震宇. 砌体墙抗震性能分析模型及其工程应用[D]. 上海:上海交通大学, 2015.
ZHU Zhenyu. Analysis model of seismic behavior of masonry walls and its engineering application[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2015.(in Chinese)
[17] 杨卫忠. 砌体受压本构关系模型[J]. 建筑结构, 2008, 38(10): 80-82.
YANG Weizhong. Constitutive relationship model for masonry materials in compression[J]. Building Structure, 2008, 38(10): 80-82.(in Chinese)
[18] 杨玉成, 杨柳, 高云学, 等. 现有多层砖房震害预测的方法及其可靠度[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 1982, 2(3): 75-86.
YANG Yucheng, YANG Liu, GAO Yunxue, et al. Method of damage prediction for existing multi story brick buildings and its reliability[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 1982, 2(3): 75-86.(in Chinese)
[19] 吕西林, 苏宁粉, 周颖. 复杂高层结构基于增量动力分析法的地震易损性分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2012, 32(5): 19-25.
LU Xilin, SU Ningfen, ZHOU Ying. IDA-based seismic fragility analysis of a complex high-rise structure[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2012, 32(5): 19-25.(in Chinese)
[20] 温卫平. 主余震地震动参数特征及损伤谱研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2015.
WEN Weiping. Study on parameter characteristics and damage spectra for mainshock aftershock ground motions[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2015.(in Chinese)
[21] LUCO N, Cornell C A. Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2007, 23(2): 357-392.
[22] 温卫平, 籍多发, 虞亦琦, 等. 考虑余震影响的RC框架结构抗震设计方法[J]. 土木工程学报, 2021, 54(2): 43-49.
WEN Weiping, JI Duofa, YU Yiqi, et al. Seismic design method of RC frame structures considering effects of aftershocks[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2021, 54(2): 43-49.(in Chinese)
[23] 程诗焱, 韩建平, 于晓辉, 等. 基于BP神经网络的RC框架结构地震易损性曲面分析:考虑地震动强度和持时的影响[J]. 工程力学, 2021, 38(12): 107-117.
CHENG Shiyan, HAN Jianping, YU Xiaohui, et al. Seismic fragility surface analysis of rc frame structures based on bp neural networks: accounting for the effects of ground motion intensity and duration[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2021, 38(12): 107-117.(in Chinese)
[24] 薛云勤. 主余震序列型地震动作用下RC框架结构累积附加损伤研究[D]. 哈尔滨:中国地震局工程力学研究所, 2016.
XUE Yunqin. Study on cumulative additional damage of RC frame structures under main shock-aftershork sequence-type ground motions[D]. Harbin: Institute of Engineering Mechanics China Earthquake Administration, 2016.(in Chinese)
[25] 赵春风, 周磊, 于娜, 等. 考虑主余震作用下的核岛厂房结构易损性研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2021, 41(1): 113-121.
ZHAO Chunfeng, ZHOU Lei, YU Na, et al. Fragility analysis of nuclear island structure under mainshock-aftershock sequences[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2021, 41(1): 113-121.(in Chinese)
[26] 虞亦琦. 考虑主余震效应的钢筋混凝土框架结构抗震设计方法[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2020.
YU Yiqi. Seismic design method of reinforcement concrete frame structures considering main shock-aftershock effects[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2020.(in Chinese)
[27] 李龙师. 松原查干花震区农村房屋抗震性能研究及震害预测[D]. 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所, 2020.
LI Longshi. Seismic capacity analysis and earthquake damage prediction of rural houses in Chaganhua earthquake area of Songyuan city[D]. Harbin: Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, 2020.(in Chinese)
[28] 吕大刚, 于晓辉. 基于地震易损性解析函数的概率地震风险理论研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2013, 34(10): 41-48.
LU Dagang, YU Xiaohui. Theoretical study of probabilistic seismic risk assessment based on analytical functions of seismic fragility[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2013, 34(10): 41-48.(in Chinese)

相似文献/References:

[1]王海东,张寅科.地震强度指标选择对长周期钢结构余震IDA分析的影响[J].世界地震工程,2022,38(02):058.[doi:10.19994/j.cnki.WEE.2022.0032]
　WANG Haidong,ZHANG Yinke.Influence of ground motion intensity selection on aftershock IDA analysis of long-period steel structure[J].,2022,38(02):058.[doi:10.19994/j.cnki.WEE.2022.0032]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-08-11; 修回日期:2022-10-24
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(51968047、51608249)
作者简介:周 强(1983—),男,副教授,博士,主要从事结构抗震及灾场仿真研究. E-mail:zhouqiang@ncu.edu.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01